Friday, August 8, 2008

Experiencing Greenwich Village: Falafel

The day after arriving in Greenwich Village, I began to notice signs everywhere advertising "the best falafel in town." While I consider myself reasonably well cultured when it comes to experiencing different kinds of food, I had never heard of a "falafel." But, despite my ignorance, I was immediately drawn to the food. Maybe my attraction was due to the fact that it was something new. Maybe it was because of all the signs. Or maybe it was just because all the advertisements said it was just two bucks, and I couldn't find anything else anywhere close to that price. Whatever the attraction was, I quickly dragged wife to try our first falafels.


Falafel is made from fava beans or chickpeas (or a combination of the two). The Egyptian variation uses fava beans, while other variations generally use chickpeas. Chickpea falafels are served across the Middle East, particularly in Israel, and have been popularized by expatriates of those countries living abroad. The beans used for falafel are soaked, then ground with the addition of a small quantity of onion, parsley, spices, and then deep fried.


The chickpea has an amazing history of its own. The chickpea was used as a food item in Palestine before 4000 BC, and was a common street dish in ancient Rome. Historians note that the chickpea was one of the earliest crops cultivated in Mesopotamia. Archeological evidence identifies chickpeas in the Sumerian diet before 2500 BC.


Falafel is generally served in a pita (either inside the pita, which acts as a pocket, or wrapped in a flat pita). The falafel balls, whole or crushed, are topped with "salads," consisting of lettuce, tomato, onion, and often a little carrot and purple cabbage. A wonderful sause, called, tehina, is then drizzled over the top. To add a bit of a kick, I then pour hot sause over the top


While falafel sandwhiches are amazing by themselves, what makes them absolutely amazing is paying an extra fifty cents and having a few scoops of humas smothered inside the pita before the other ingredients are added. This is, without a doubt, one of my favorite meals of all time (an opinion which Wife does not share).


When walking through Greenwich Village, you will find countless places that want to sell you a falafel - but there is one shop that stands head and shoulders above the rest: Mamoun's Falafel. The lines are always incredibly long, but they move shockingly fast. Know what you want to order before you get in line (this is very important). When the clerk points at you and shouts,"Next," be prepared to immediately shout out what you want. Failure to observe this point will result in a painful belittling by the clerk and jeers from the crowd waiting in line (I have seen this happen to countless tourists). But the process is very easy. When the clerk points at you, just rattle off, "A falafel sandwhich with humas."

119 MacDougal St
New York, NY 10012
212-674-8685
Open 365 Days A Year
Open 11am - 5am Everyday

Thursday, August 7, 2008

God Bless Airlines

I'm currently back in my old state (state I left a year ago - not the old state from four years ago). On my way here, I had a layover in North Carolina. I haven't spent much time there, but it seemed like a nice state. Nice enough that my luggage decided to stay behind and experience a little more of it. The airline promises me that my luggage will be delivered to me tonight - it had better...I need it. My grandmother trained me to ALWAYS pack necessities in my carry-on. That is advice I have followed religiously. Until this trip. I have also always been paranoid about dressing well when I fly (if you look good, they treat you well). But I threw that habit out for this trip. I have a business meeting at 7:30 tomorrow morning, and the only clothing I have with me are shorts, an old polo shirt, and grimy tennis shoes.

Experiencing Greenwich Village: The Pizzeria

One of the best foods to eat in New York is the pizza. Everybody loves pizza, and we take it VERY seriously here. We can break the genre of "pizza" into two primary types here in NYC: the kind of pizza where you buy the whole pizza ("the Brooklyn pie") and pizza where you order by the slice ("the Manhattan slice").

After we lived in the village for a couple of weeks, a coupon for the Pizzeria was delivered to our apartment. It was close, just around the corner on MacDougal, and it was cheap. For about eight bucks, we could get a whole pizza with three toppings (an amazing deal here in NY). Wife and I ordered our pizza with pepperoni, sausage, and olives - we agreed it was amazing. Not only do we get a great, quick meal, but we had leftovers for the rest of the week. We liked the pizza so much we picked up another coupon (or fifty).

While their whole pie is very good, the Pizzaria's slices are amazing. I found these slices earlier this year when I was studying for long hours and needed something quick. For two dollars and change, the Pizzeria provides a huge slice of pizza and a drink with free refills (one of the very, very few places that provides free refills in New York). To prove yourself a true New Yorker, you need to shake on some parmasian cheese, crushed red peppers, and then pour on some hot sauce. Then fold the slice over and enjoy. The slices here are absolutely amazing.

For those who aren't familiar with the Manhattan slice, what most pizzerias do is to bake their huge pizzas about 2/3 of the way. When a customer orders a slice, they then throw the slice into the oven to finish off the cooking process. Every customer gets a steaming hot slice that is simply out of this world.

New Yorkers love to argue about the best pizza parlors - but for my money, when I just want a slice, I run to the Pizzeria on MacDougal Street. It's cheap, it's quick, and it's very good.

Visit the Pizzeria's website HERE.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Experiencing Greenwich Village

This evening, Wife and I officially give up our Greenwich Village apartment. When we moved into the apartment last August, we were initially dismayed with the thought of squeezing into a studio apartment for a year. Within a week, we began to love our double studio overlooking Broadway. Earlier this week, we moved all of our stuff out of the old apartment and into the new one. As we started carrying boxes out, Wife actually started to cry – we really did grow fond of the place over the last year.


We also grew very fond of Greenwich Village. I remember our first evening in the city. Wife and I decided to take a walk to find something for dinner. We had arrived earlier in the day after taking a red-eye from the West Coast. By dinner time, we were completely disoriented. We were exhausted, annoyed, and starving. We wanted a quick, cheap bite to eat, but, after walking for what felt like hours, we couldn’t find anything reasonably priced to eat. The best we could find were pathetic little sandwiches. Wife was annoyed because she was so tired and hungry. I was annoyed because I just paid $20 for two small take-out sandwiches. As we sat and ate our sandwiches we really didn’t know what the year would bring. As it turns out, we lived around the corner from a plethora of amazing, cheap eateries. But it did take us a while to find them.


Over the next week or so, we will highlight some of our favorite places to eat in the Village. Frequently, tourists stop us on the street and ask us where they should go to eat (I suppose we look like friendly New Yorkers). We’ve been giving solicited advice on the street for going on a year – now we’ll give some unsolicited advice on the internet. To date, my post on my favorite bagel shops is the most post on the blog. Maybe people will be just as interested in our opinion on where to get pizza, falafel, Hallal, Chinese, and Italian.

Monday, August 4, 2008

One Bar Exam Story

The bar is, obviously, stressful. Most exam takers study long hours for the weeks leading up to the exam and many are unable to sleep the night before the exam. I am told that countless examinees have trouble sleeping for days, or even weeks, in preparation for big day. On the first day of the exam, we were told to arrive rather early in the morning. After a morning session of grueling testing, we all had to wait for about an hour and a half for the afternoon session to begin. One gentleman was understandably extremely tired. After returning from lunch, he sat down at his desk to wait for the session to begin. As he sat in silence, realizing that nothing would happen for about half an hour, the gentleman fell asleep at his desk. The test was handed out - a proctor put his test next to the gentleman's head. A proctor read instructions over the loud speaker (a very, very loud speaker). The man continued to doze. The announcement was made that we could begin the exam. The fellow never woke up. Several test takers around him felt horrible, but knew that if they woke him up, they risked immediate disqualification for communicating with another examinee. Even when time was called after the entire afternoon session was completed, the gentleman never stirred. When the six thousand test takers were released and made their mad dash to the exit, the gentleman was finally jolted into consiousness. Hopefully, he will be more well-rested before the February '09 Bar Exam.

Saturday, August 2, 2008

It'll Take a Lifetime of Therapy to Get Over This

I won’t re-hash the entire experience – it’s just too painful – but here are few bullet points:


*Approximately 6,000 candidates took the Bar exam at my location (the most of any location in the country).


*Each of the candidates is a graduate of an accredited law school. The vast majority of them are very bright and work extremely hard. Yet over 40% of the candidates at my location will fail.


*Janitorial staff were on hand at the bathrooms to clean up the "messes" (and I saw many people vomiting due to the stress).


*Wife waited in line with me before each day of the exam. The sights she saw shocked her: several “pukers,” a couple nervous breakdowns, a bunch of hysterical criers, and hundreds of drug bottles.


* Over the last several days, a surprising number of people found this blog by googling, "Flunked the New York Bar Exam." Does Google know something I don't?


I doubt I will discuss the exam again until the results are announced in about four months. If I comment on it, I passed. If I make no reference to the bar, just expect to learn I’m retaking it again in February.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

It is My Turn to Post!

People have been questioning where I have been lately, so I thought I would fill you all in on what has kept me busy as Husband studies for the Bar Exam. I have been putting in a lot of hours at work. A good friend once said (and he may have been quoting someone else, for all I know) “I go to work and stay late, not for the job I currently have, but for the job I want.” That has been my philosophy these last few months and thankfully it has paid off.

While the rest of the economy is starting to take a downtown, my company is continuing to strive (knock on wood) and we are opening up new offices. As of this past week I have officially been told that I will have the pleasure of running the financial aspects of one of our foreign offices as well as managing one of our most lucrative clients that gives us business in all our offices. What does this mean? Well besides the long hours, headaches and stress - this will mean that I get to learn a whole new financial system and attempt to implement it into our new office (that is the aspect I am most looking forward to). Once I have the system down and know what I need to do, I will then have to get our office setup with efficient, cutting edge procedures so that all financial processes, from A/R, A/P to Reporting, can run as smoothly as possible. I will then help hire more accountants and managers to run the day-to-day tasks. This new position is a huge obstacle in front of me, but I cannot wait to get started.

As you are undoubtedly aware, all companies have politics - I am sure to hit some speed bumps as I attempt to take control away from our “mother ship” and give us more control and power. Within the next two years, all American offices will be switch over to this new financial system that I am implementing in the office I will oversee. With me learning this system ahead of time, I will be better prepared to know what will need to be done so that we can successfully switch here in the US. My goal is to eventually become finance director of all of our world-wide offices (a position that does not yet exist) and lead the way for future expansion (Asia … here we come).

So besides work keeping me busy, I have been sorting out all aspects of our impending move. It is more complicated than one would think. The first task was to find a new place to live in the city that was close to both Husband’s firm and my office. Mission Accomplished. The next challenge is to decide what to do with all of our stuff that has been calling a storage shed home for the past nine months. On top of all that I need to pick out a new bed and that is something that leaves me completely spellbound (I welcome any advice on beds). These fun tasks (plus a visit back to where we lived for the last three years, and a business trip to our foreign office) will be keeping me busy for the next month.

Husband recently just celebrated a birthday and unfortunately he had to spend his second birthday in a row studying for the Bar Exam. I'm not sure that spending 13 hours studying in the library is his ideal birthday celebration. This will also be the second year in a row Husband will be taking the Bar on our anniversary. I anticipate this will be the last time Husband takes a Bar Exam. This is the last big test he will ever have to take. That has to be an exciting feeling! (I must admit I am a little envious he is done with school as I have still another year or so left of my MBA). It is fun and exciting times here in NYC!

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Not Everyone Passes the Bar Exam

To help ease the stress of studying for the Bar Exam, I thought I would post a short list of notable men and women who failed. Certainly, there are countless names that deserve to be on this list that I left off, but here are a few;
  • Jerry Brown: Attorney General of California (and former California governor). Failed the California bar once before passing.
  • Hillary Clinton: Failed the D.C. bar exam in the 1970s, but passed the Arkansas bar.
  • John F. Kennedy, Jr. (deceased): Son of President John F. Kennedy. Failed the New York bar twice, before passing on the third try. Served as an assistant district attorney in New York from 1989 to 1993.
  • David Paterson: Governor of New York, failed the New York Bar Exam once, and he never sat for it again.
  • Emily Pataki: Dughter of former New York Governor George Pataki. Failed the New York bar the first time, but passed the second time.
  • Kathleen Sullivan: Former dean of Stanford law school, leading constitutional law scholar, and possible Supreme Court nominee in a Democratic administration, failed the California bar exam when she took it in July 2005.
  • Pete Wilson: Former California governor. Failed the California bar exam three times, before passing on his fourth try.
  • Richard M Daley, mayor of Chicago, failed twice.
  • Ed Koch failed before going on to be mayor of New York City and more importantly the judge on the People's Court.
  • Antonio Villaraigosa, mayor of Los Angeles, has failed the California Bar 4 times, and has yet to pass.
  • Harold Ford, chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) and is a former member of the United States House of Representatives from Tennessee.
  • Pat Robertson. Yes, THAT Pat Robertson is a graduate of Yale Law School, but he failed the NY bar and never took it again.
  • Greg Mathis, the television judge.
  • Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States.
  • Charlie Crist, governor of Florida, failed the exam twice.
  • Jerry Brown, former California governor, managed to pass on his second attempt.
  • Pete Wilson, another former California governor, did not pass until his fourth attempt.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Bar Exam Snacks

Studying for the Bar exam really isn't good for my waistline. Some major candy manufacturers are client's of Wife's - and they send her home with amazing quantities of chocolate. She has incredible self-control and eats none of it. But me...well...I'm enjoying the chocolate too much to care as I try to cram thousands of lists of elements into my head.

My law firm helped to heap on the calories by sending me a box of "brain food" along with a sweet card wishing me good luck, signed by my "Friends" at Law Firm. While the goodies are a wonderful gesture, the tremendous amount they spent on overnight shipping these boxes across the country disturbs me. Personally, I think a nice restaurant gift certificate, just for the amount they spent on shipping, would have been more useful. Of course, I suppose it would be taxable income. I'll have to check the tax code to see if there is an exception for a box of food from the definition of taxable income. I'll think about that after the Bar. I am in the process of expunging everything I ever learned about the tax code so that I can memorize the five factors the court will consider when determining whether a non-compete clause in a partnership agreement is enforceable (and thousands of other useless lists).

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Love and Marriage in New York

In my Bar Exam studies, I have reached New York family law, which is a subject in which I have absolutely no previous knowledge. In my studies, I found a few discoveries surprising about New York law. I'm wading through new territory for me, so I'm finding these laws quite humorous:

* The law in NY actually provides that an engagement ring be given back to the gift-giver if the wedding is called off.

* Under old law (no longer good law), if an engagement is called off, a spurned person could sue her former fiance for "breach of promise to marry."

* Under old New York law, a father of a single woman could sue a man who has sex with his daughter for "seduction of an unmarried female."

* Under old law, a spouse could sue both his spouse and a new lover for adultery, alienation of affection, and criminal conversion (i.e., theft). Under current law, it is a felony to file such a suit.

* While a lawyer can generally take property as his fee, the lawyer cannot take a mortgage on a house.

* First cousins and step-siblings CAN legally marry.

* 18 year olds have the legal capacity to marry. 16 year olds can marry with the consent of both parents. 14 year olds can marry with consent of both parents and a judge (but a judge will generally only consent if there is a pregnancy). I found it surprising that a 14 year old could ever get married.

* A "shot-gun wedding" is voidable at the pressured party's option if a court finds that duress nullified consent. The ability to annul the wedding is waived if the parties freely cohabitate after te wedding.

* Misrepresentation/concealment of a person's religion, religious devotion, intention to convert, or intention to raise children in faith is grounds for annulment of marriage.

* Misrepresentation/concealment of a person's sexual history is grounds for annulment of marriage.

* Misrepresentation about money, salary, employment, job title is not fraud for an annulment. So, I could have told Fiance I was the chief of surgery making $1,000,000 a year with a trust fund worth $50,000,000 when I am really a janitor that barely scrapes buy - this is not actionable fraud. Why? Because the state takes the position that people do not marry for economic or social class motivations.

* New York is the only state that does not have "no fault divorce." Because of that it is theoretically possible for one spouse to desperately want a divorce, but for the partner to refuse to grant it forever (but there is a solution for that: move out of New York, wait long enough for the new state to get jurisdiction, then get a no fault divorce).

* Adultery is grounds for divorce. However, a "defense" for adultery is that your spouse committed adultery first. Another defense is also that your spouse arranged the affair (i.e., your spouse tried to entrap you - and it worked; any testimony of prostitutes or private detectives must be corroborated). So, imagine this: Wife sues for divorce claiming the grounds of adultery. Husband argues, "Well, you cheated on me too." The judge says, "Valid defense. You two deserve each other. No divorce."

* There is case law suggesting that moving from a shared bedroom to a guestroom is legal abandonment of one's spouse.

* In New York, academic degrees and professional licenses are marital property if they were awarded during the marriage. So, I guess if Wife and I got divorced, I she would get the J and I would keep the D? No, actually, the court will determine how the degree or license enhances lifetime earnings and then add that number to the marital property to be divided.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE; YOU ARE NOT A CLIENT; I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. THIS IS MERELY RAMBLING ON A BLOG. IF YOU WANT LEGAL ADVICE, GO TALK TO AN ATTORNEY.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

New Housing Addendum

Returning to the subject our new NYC housing, the funniest part of the process came yesterday when Wife was speaking with the leasing manager about arranging a time for the “closing.” The agent said to her, "Oh yeah, your husband is a lawyer. I'd better send you the lease now so everything will go smoothly at the closing." Apparently, he’s familiar with my kind.

After spending some time reviewing the contract, I decided that the 38-page monstrosity is surprisingly fair. Unfortunately, we were required to waive our right to a jury trial if a dispute arises. This is unfortunate because I have an ace up my sleeve to ensure victory in a jury trial. If I had a personal matter that had to be tried before a jury, the first thing I would do is get LindaJ up here so that she could work her magic in front of a jury.

We Own an Interest in Manhattan Property

Wife and I now officially own an interest in real property here in Manhattan. This afternoon, we signed the contract for a leasehold estate in a term for years. No, we did not purchase fee simple or another freehold estate, but our leasehold IS an ownership interest in property (how else do you expect me to talk - the Bar is in less than three weeks). Our new living quarters will be in a high rise building located in Midtown West, not far from Times Square, and within walking distance of both of our jobs.

Actually, we already had an interest in our current apartment in Greenwich Village, but now we have a new apartment near the yuppies to move into when our time with the Bohemians ends.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

What is the Best Gift for Somebody Studying for the Bar?

Last night, I checked the statistics for the blog. To my surprise, I found that quite a number of people have found this site after googling “best gift for someone studying for the bar exam” (or some variation of those search terms). Though I am diligently preparing for the bar, I have absolutely no idea why Google suggests this blog to a person searching for gifts. But for those of you who have found our site looking for presents to give loved ones, I thought it would be nice to offer you some gift suggestions:
  • A time machine that provides extra study time during the day.
  • A time machine for those who need to return to May and then do the last six weeks over, this time without procrastinating.
  • A cushion to sit on (library chairs can be very uncomfortable after long periods of time).
  • Prepared meals.
  • A collection of pens and pencils for the Bar Exam (exam takers seem to feel the need to bring in a wide collection of writing instruments, preparing for the full days of non-stop writing).
  • Magic herbs that increase memory.

Those are just a few ideas I had off the top of my head. Feel free to add suggestions in the comments.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

The Supreme Court Makes a Mistake?

Undoubtedly, no matter what your political persuasion, you frequently disagree with Supreme Court decisions. However, last week the Supreme Court’s decision on the punishment for child rape contained a surprising factual error.

Last Week, Supreme Court announced its controversial decision of Kennedy v. Louisiana which held that the death penalty is not a constitutional penalty the rape of a child. In this decision, the Court surveyed the law in the United States governing the maximum permissible sentence for such a crime. Both the majority and the dissent overlooked a congressional statute right on point.

When Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, held that capital punishment for child rape was against the “evolving standards of decency” by which the court judges how the death penalty is applied, he based that holding, at least in part, on the fact that a child rapist could face death in only six states — not in any of the 30 other states that have the death penalty, and not under the jurisdiction of the federal government either.

The Court observed:

By contrast, 44 States have not made child rape a capital offense. As for federal law, Congress in the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 expanded the number of federal crimes for which the death penalty is a permissible sentence, including certain nonhomicide offenses; but it did not do the same for child rape or abuse. See 108 Stat. 1972 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 18 U. S.U. S. C. §2245, an offender is death eligible only when the sexual abuse or exploitation results in the victim's death. Kennedy, slip op. at 12-13. C.).
The majority continued:
Thirty-seven jurisdictions—36 States plus the Federal Government—have the death penalty. As mentioned above, only six of those jurisdictions authorize the death penalty for rape of a child. Id. at 15.
Writing for the four dissenters, Justice Alito countered:

The Court notes that Congress has not enacted a law permitting the death penalty for the rape of a child, ante, at 12–13, but due to the territorial limits of the relevant federal statutes, very few rape cases, not to mention child-rape cases, are prosecuted in federal court….Congress' failure to enact a death penalty statute for this tiny set of cases is hardly evidence of Congress' assessment of our society's values." Kennedy, dissent slip op. at 13 (Alito, J., dissenting)

However, in 2006, Congress enacted a law permitting the death penalty for the rape of a child. Section 552(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, 119 Stat. 3136, 3264 (2006), provides that "the punishment which a court-martial may direct for an offense under" the amended UCMJ article 120 "may not exceed the following limits: . . . For an offense under subsection (a) (rape) or subsection (b) (rape of a child), death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct."

To cut through the legal jargon, in 2006 Congress passed, and the President signed, a law pertaining to military tribunals which permits the death penalty for child rape. This is a congressional statute expressly authorizing the death penalty for the rape of a child, which, apparently, everyone failed to notice.

While this finding does not change the outcome of the case, and, probably, would not have changed a single vote, one would think that with all of the lawyers, clerks, and justices that worked on this case, they would have found that statute.

Perhaps our “standards of decency” have not evolved as much as Kennedy would like to believe.

The New York Times reports on the story HERE.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Quote of the Day

"It's very dangerous to make predictions. Especially about the future."

Richard D. Freer
(Robert Howell Hall Professor of Law at Emery School of Law)

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

A Legal Question

As our regular readers undoubtedly noticed, blogging has been relatively light recently. There are a couple reasons for that. One of the reasons is that I am studying for the Bar Exam, and that makes me, honestly, pretty much incapable of talking about anything else. I don't really want to turn the blog into a whiny, rambling tirade about the Bar. But as I study, I occasionally start thinking through hypotheticals and legal oddities. As I study, I thought I would write what I consider to be interesting fact patterns and their results.

Topic: Conflicts of Law

Legal Background: Domicile is essentially where a person lives (it is where the person intends to stay indefinitely). A person can only have one domicile. Where a person is domiciled is generally where they owe local taxes (but the issue here is domicile, not taxes).

Fact Pattern: Joe has always lived in Scranton, Pennsylvania, but he has always dreamed of retiring in the Big Apple. After making a fortune in Scranton selling paper, he decides to fulfill his dream and move to NYC. Before the move, Joe is visiting with his lawyer, Larry. Larry says, "Hold on now. With your particular portfolio, estate taxes are much better for you in Pennsylvania than New York.** I'm a brilliant lawyer, so I have a plan for you. Go ahead and move to New York, but don't change your legal residence. Make sure everyone knows that your domicile is Pennsylvania. That way your family won't need to pay New York estate taxes when you die." Joe loves the idea of avoiding taxes, so he follows Larry's advice. He buys his dream condo in New York and resides there most of the time, but Joe keeps his address in Scranton. To ensure that everyone knows that he has no intention of changing his domicile, Joe mentions to people he meets at parties, "Hey, don't forget, my domicile is Scranton, and I intend to keep it there until I die." In reality, once he moves, Joe never again enters the state of Pennsylvania. Joe dies in New York. Which state can collect estate taxes from Joe's estate?

A. Lawyer Larry thought up a perfect scheme - no state can collect taxes.

B. Only New York can collect estate taxes because Joe's actions demonstrate that he indeed intended to move his domicile to New York.

C. Only Pennsylvania can collect estate taxes because Joe was careful to leave evidence that he intended PA to be his domicile.

D. Both New York and Pennsylvania can collect estate taxes from him. His estate will pay taxes twice, and without any set-off or credit from paying taxes to the other state.

Answer: Lawyer Larry had better call his malpractice insurance carrier and warn them of an imminent claim because D is the correct answer.

Reasoning: New York will successfully argue that Joe's only domicile is NY because his "actions speak louder than words" - by moving to NY and spending all his time there, his actions show his intent was to make NY his domicile. PA will successfully argue that PA is his only domicile because he demonstrated the intent to keep their state as his home for the indefinite future by keeping his address and telling everyone it is his domicile. Thus, both states will successfully argue that Joe only has one domicile - in their state.

* In reality, it is doubtful that estate taxes would be lower in PA than NY.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE; YOU ARE NOT A CLIENT; I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. THIS IS MERELY RAMBLING ON A BLOG. IF YOU WANT LEGAL ADVICE, GO TALK TO AN ATTORNEY.

Sunday, June 29, 2008

We Almost Saw Her Jump

Yesterday, Wife and I were exploring apartment buildings in the Financial District, searching for our new home. When we returned home, we saw the breaking news: a supermodel jumped to her death from her 9th floor apartment. Just about an hour before in the incident, Wife and I walked on the sidewalk underneath her apartment.

According to the associated press:

A European Vogue cover model fell to her death from her Manhattan apartment building Saturday in an apparent suicide, published reports said.

Ruslana Korshunova, 20, died around 2:30 p.m. in a fall from a building on Water Street, in Manhattan's Financial District, The New York Post, the Daily News and Newsday reported. The newspapers cited unnamed officials and police.

Police said the fall was under investigation. Korushnova's New York agency and a spokeswoman for medical examiners did not immediately return telephone messages.

Originally from the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan, the almond-eyed, flowing-haired Korshunova appeared in advertisements and on runways for such designers as Marc Jacobs, Nina Ricci and DKNY. British Vogue hailed her as "a face to be excited about" in 2005.

"She looked like something out of a fairytale!" Jones told the magazine. "We had to find her and we searched high and low until we did!"


HERE is the story.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Sibling Rivalry

This is absolutely hilarious. This video has two short clips, it is the second that is worth watching.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Judges Hate Sudoku

Possibly the law has irreparably warped my already quirky sense of humor, but I thought this was hilarious:


An Australian judge has aborted a drug trial after discovering that some of the jurors were playing the puzzle game Sudoku while evidence was being given. ...

The judge was alerted after it was observed the jurors were writing vertically, rather than horizontally. It had been assumed they were taking notes.

The jury foreperson admitted to the judge that four to five jurors were playing puzzle games for up to half the time the trial had been going.


You can read the full story HERE.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Shakespeare in Central Park

This past Friday night, Wife and I journeyed out to Central Park to enjoy this one of this summer’s performances of Shakespeare in the Park. This month, the Public Theater is presenting the timeless classic “Hamlet.” Last summer, Wife and I enjoyed “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” (as long-time readers of our blog may remember). We hoped to attend this summer’s performances as well, but when we learned that Sam Waterston would play one of the leads, our attendance became mandatory (we both love the classic Law & Orders).

For those not familiar with the concept, every summer the Public Theater presents Shakespeare in the Park. Performances run six days a week for about a month, and each of these shows is free to anyone who is lucky enough to get a ticket (last year Wife waited in line for several hours to get tickets, but this year, we simply signed up for an online drawing).

The show was great. Not only is the show a classic, but the actors were all tremendous, particularly Michael Stuhlbarg in the title role. The set was surprisingly good. In my shallowness, my favorite aspect of the show was sitting twenty feet from Sam Waterston appearing as Polonius opposite Lauren Ambrose as Ophelia with Andre Braugher as Claudius and Margaret Colin as Gertrude.

Here is a video from last year to help you experience a little bit of the Shakespeare in the Park culture.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Scams in New York City

Wife and I continue our apartment hunt (ok, she continues the apartment hunt while I make inappropriate comments and suggestions). Every time we find a good deal here in Manhattan, we receive this response, which I posted below. See you if can spot the scam; I'll explain after the email (background: $1,750 is a very good deal for this apartment - but we have gotten this same type of response for deals that are just slightly better than average).

Hello WIFE,

First of all I would like to thank you for your reply to my apartment listing.

Now I would like to clear up some details. LOCATION: Midtown-West, Manhattan, 57th, 8th Ave.

Located in Columbus Circle, this apartment features newly renovated one bedroom, livingroom, kitchen, bath, in the heart of village directions, close to everyday amenities like video rental, pharmacy, and takeout, ideal for professional singles or couple.

The apartment is available for rent starting now for $ 1,750.00/month (parking spot and laundry facilities included).

The lease can be for a minimum 3 months. I’m the full right owner, I’m no broker or something else… The other utilities aren’t included in this price (rent/month), utilities are about $60.00-$80.00/month. Everything in this apartment is functional because is new. If you need to do some repairs in the apt(the worst case that could happen), i will refund the reparations cost, or i will deduct those from monthly payment. I moved with my job in England/ Liverpool, and I need money to pay the rent here; that is the reason I want to rent the apartment for this price, and also to find a trustworthy person for my apartment. I can rent you the apt for max. 3 years because I signed a working contract here for this period. Unfortunately I am the only person who own the keys, no one else have access in the apartment because it's a private property, but i am sure that we will find a compromise.

My conditions are: you must have two months rent in advance at the beginning of your staying and you will begin paying the rent normally from the 3rd month.
Your background credit must be clean.

Thank you for your interest and wait news from you.

Best Regards!
Karen LAST NAME,

BTW: This is a cat and dog-friendly building (no weight limit).



The scam is simply this: the "landlord" has always recently moved abroad for work (for some reason almost always to England) and wants to immediately rent their apartment. Because of their rush, they offer a great price. However, since they are abroad, they cannot show the apartment. But don't worry. You can look outside the building and see that it is a great building. If you want to see pictures, they can even email you some pictures of the inside. Since they are abroad, they cannot give you the keys either. Thus, all you need to do is wire them thousands of dollars (i.e., first two months rent, usually a security deposit as well), and then they will immediately overnight you the keys to move in. Let's take a vote: do you really think that an anonymous person in cyberspace is really going to mail you keys to an apartment you've never seen after you wire them several thousand dollars?

We have received more of these emails than we can count. I wonder how many people really fall for this scam.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Yeah, I'm Studying for the Bar

Much to my annoyance, Law School has invited the masses to study in our library for the July Bar Exam. Like most law schools, my school expects patrons to act responsibly in the library, maintaining common courtesies such as keeping quiet, refraining from talking on cell phones, and not bringing food into the library. Unfortunately, these intruders have no respect for either our library or those of us trying to study for the Bar.

Recently, an obnoxious jerk had a long cell phone conversation as he munched on his bag of Doritos while sitting at the table next to me. The essence of the conversation was that he was trying to pick up a woman with the bait that he is a great catch because he studies for the Bar Exam at Law School library, despite the fact that he actually graduated from the worst law school in the state. As I ground my teeth waiting for this fellow to get off his phone, I did what any reasonable person studying for the Bar Exam would do: I began to think up a hypothetical Bar Exam question.

For your contemplation, here’s the sample question:

Dwight, a Newark, New Jersey, domiciliary, sat in the at the law school in Manhattan studying when Johnny, who was sitting next to him, decided to spend his afternoon watching YouTube videos on his computer with the volume turned up at full blast while talking on his cell phone. Enraged, Dwight grabbed Johnny’s cell phone and threw it at Johnny’s head as he yelled, “Take this you meanie-head, I hope this causes you lots of pain, but certainly no permanent bodily injury.” In his furry, Dwight completely missed Johnny, and the cell phone flew across the room, striking Nick on the back of the head. Surprised, Nick flew out of his seat with the exclamation, “Golly, what was that? Is the sky falling?” However, at that moment, Lucy was walking back to her seat after making a coffee run at SunDollars. Food and drink are not allowed in the library, but when Lucy entered the library, the librarian noticed the cup in her hand but decided to ignore the infraction. When Nick jumped out of his seat, he accidentally bumped Lucy, who then stumbled backwards and spilled her coffee on a desk where Paula was typing on her laptop computer. The only reason that Lucy made the coffee run was because Paula offered to buy Lucy an ice latte if Lucy would bring her a quadruple iced espresso with nine sugars. To pay for the drinks, Paula gave Lucy a forged check for $45 that she stole from her mother's checkbook, which her mother kept hidden in her sock drawer. Though Paula forged her mother's signature well, she wrote in the subject line of the check, "You dopes. I stole this check and it is a forgery. Suckers." Lucy endorsed the check with a crayon and gave it to her friend Jim as a gift. Jim used the check to buy a stolen television from Kirk. Kirk cashed the check at "Quick and Easy Cash Checking Company." Lucy forgot Paula's order and brought her hot black coffee instead. The hot black coffee spilled on Paula’s arm, causing minor, but painful burns and also staining her lucky sweater that she had worn to every test since the second grade. Instead moving her coffee or cleaning up the coffee, Paula lept up and began to yell at Lucy, “You putz! Why don’t you watch where you are going? My arm hurts and my sweater is ruined. I can never pass the bar exam without my lucky sweater.” The coffee spread across the table, onto the computer cord, and black smoke began to immediately billow from the machine. Without hesitation, Nick grabbed the computer’s power with the intention of unplugging it, but the moment he touched the cord, he felt a strong electronic shock run through his body, causing him to fall to the floor in an epileptic seizure. As his convulsions subsided, Nick cried out, “I know this is the end for me. Tell my girlfriend, Jill, I love her. I want her to have all my earthly possessions when I die. I don’t care about June, my wife, anymore or that stupid will that we both signed yesterday our attorney’s office which left all of my stuff to her. And I can’t go to my grave with my deep dark secret: I saw Dwight steal a treatise on Constitutional law from the bookstore last week. After he got away with it, I stole a securities regulation treatise, but I felt guilty so I brought it back the next day.” At that very moment, Officer Joe was walking through the library in time to see the smoke and hear the confession. Officer Joe was only a university security guard and was not authorized to carry weapons of any kind. Officer Joe, believing this was his big chance to show what he was made of, announced, “Dwight, Nick, you’re under arrest. Do you have anything to say for yourselves?” Dwight said, “Yeah, I did it. Arrest me.” Nick, while still floundering on the ground, retorted, “You’ll never take me alive.” Officer Joe pulled out an illegal taser gun and shocked Nick the legs. Nick suddenly died. The official autopsy report concludes that Nick had a rare allergy to electricity. The electric shock he was received would definitely have killed him within twenty minutes, but the shock by Officer Joe accelerated his death. Immediately, the Dean of the school arrived and said, “This is terrible, but we are responsible for nothing. Look, there is a sign by the door saying that our school bears no responsibility for anything that occurs in the library whether by negligence, malice, or even intentional actions.” Despite her best efforts, Paula can no longer concentrate without her lucky sweater, so she failed the Bar exam. She had an offer of employment from Law Firm, which Partner orally promised would not be revoked, even if she failed the Bar; however Paula received the lowest grade in the state on the exam, so Law Firm did revoke her offer telling her, “You must be the stupidest person this side of the Mississippi.” Since Paula had no job, she stayed home all day and blasted Techno music all day in her apartment, which is located in Long Island City. Without warning or notice, her landlord evicted her because of the noise. Her landlord points to the following clause in the lease: “Landlord is all wise and may do whatever he wants without any complaints from any tenant, nor any legal liability whatsoever. He may simply never, ever, ever be sued.” Paula admits she signed the lease, but claims she never read it. Paula’s father is so enraged to learn that his daughter never read the lease that he tells her, “I oughta slap you silly.”

Part 1: What criminal charges could the city prosecutor bring against Dwight, Johnny, Paula, Nick, Jill, Jim, Kirk, Lucy, Officer Joe, Paula's father, or the law school? What defenses could each assert?

Part 2: What civil suits can Nick’s estate, heirs, or devisees bring? Could anyone get rich because Nick felt lots of pain and suffering before he died? What federal and state taxes are owed for a recover for pain and suffering?

Part 3: Discuss any causes of action that Paula could bring in tort based upon these facts. What defenses may be raised. What remedies, in law or equity, might a court order?

Part 4: What civil or criminal liability does law school librarian potentially face? What if the librarian was drinking coffee himself when Lucy brought the drinks into the library?

Part 5: If Paula sued her former landlord for wrongful eviction, what result? What is the normal notice requirement required before eviction? What if the apartment building only had two units? What if it had twenty units? What if the landlord is certifiably insane?

Part 6: May Paula sue to force Law Firm to let her start work despite failing the Bar? What if the Law Firm only has seven other lawyers and all of them are men who passed the bar on the first time? What if all the lawyers at the firm were arrogant and annoying and Paula really didn't want to work there anyway?

Part 7: Assuming that Dwight is charged with a crime, are the incriminating statements made by either Dwight or Nick admissible in a criminal trial against him? Would the statements be admissible in a civil trial against them? Explain the rule of hearsay and all 38 exceptions.

Part 8: Assuming June attempts to enter Nick’s will into probate. Jill contacts you and wants your professional opinion on her claim that she should inherit from Nick. What do you tell her? What if Nick and June had three children together?

Part 9: Is the law school dean correct in his assertion that law school bears no liability for anything that occurs in the library because of the sign? If the sign did not exist, what would the law school be liable for?

Part 10: Assume SunDollars served coffee that was three degrees hotter than industry standards. What is their potential liability on these facts? What if Lucy explicitly asked for the coffee to be three degrees hotter than industry standards?

Part 11: What state courts have personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and venue over the potential causes of action? Same question regarding federal courts. Make sure you include correct citations, pinpointing all statutory sources down to the correct sub-paragraph.

Part 12: May Child Protective Services removed Paula’s eleven year old brother from her father’s home because of his actions? What if Paula's father was paraplegic and was unable to his his hands or feet?

Part 13: If Paula's mother's bank pays the check, but Paula's mother catches the forgery and reports it to the bank three months later, what result? Who will be ultimately liable for the $45? Was this a negotiable instrument? If so, who was a holder in Due Course? What warranties are applicable? What if Paula added smiley faces to the front of the check in pink crayon?

Part 14: Discuss an other legal issue or remedy that was raised by the facts that you have not yet thoughtfully discussed.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

It is official! Husband graduated from Law School. After an intense and difficult year, Husband has graduated from the number one program in the world for his field. This past year has gone by incredibly fast, and thanks to Husband’s hard work, we get to call NYC home indefinitely.

The graduation actually occurred a couple weeks ago. Now, I have been to a few graduations in my lifetime, but this was definitely the most impressive and monumental. Of all of Husband's graduations this was definitely the most elegant, organized, and prestigious. The graduation took place at a very famous venue in NYC. As I sat there listening to the entertaining keynote speaker (yes, I said entertaining), I realized that I was sitting in an auditorium filled with some of the most brilliant legal minds in the world. I sat next to a wife of one of Husband’s classmates. She and I were both in awe to as we sat back and talked about how remarkable this past year has been. Husband has worked incredibly hard this past year studying all there is to know about tax, taking the hardest classes and the hardest professors that Law School has to offer.

I believe that husband accepting this offer to attend Law School for this year was the wisest and most exciting decisions he ever made (or course, second only to his decision to marry me!). It was such a proud moment to watch Husband walk across the stage and shake the dean’s hand. Husband is constantly amazing me with his determination, dedication, and intelligence. He truly embodies the phrase; “You can do anything if you put your mind to it.”

With school and graduation now behind us, the only thing left is that measly little quiz, the Bar Exam. I am positive that while the next two months will be difficult and stressful, he will continue to succeed and survive the exam.

In short, congratulations, Husband, I love you.

Friday, May 16, 2008

That Nathan Lane Fellow Can Really Act

After a pause our social lives, Wife and I went out to see a Broadway show last night. Just as I finished my last exam, Wife saw that we could get tickets for the show November on our discount website. Because of the phenomenal cast, Wife has wanted to see that show for a while now, so she jumped on the opportunity to get tickets. In my semi-conscious state, I was in no position to do anything other than nod and say, “Whatever you want dear” (she's training me quite well).

November is a political comedy about an unpopular U.S. President running for re-election after his first term. Given our interest in politics, Wife figured that this show would be right up our alley.

Infinitely talented Nathan Lane stars in the play, along with Laurie Metcalf (probably best known for playing the sister on Rosanne) and Dylan Baker (to say nothing of his television and Broadway performances, he has had roles in Across the Universe; The Hunting Party; Fido; Spider-Man 2 and 3; Hide & Seek; Head of State; Road to Perdition; Changing Lanes; Along Came a Spider; Thirteen Days; Happiness; Disclosure; Delirious; Planes, Trains & Automobiles and The Long Walk Home. Along with starring roles in television movies Drive; The Book of Daniel; The Laramie Project; The Pitts; Feds; and Murder One.

Without a doubt, the play has a phenomenal cast. While the entire cast was great, Nathan Lane did a particularly outstanding job with his role. Several times, I just sat back astonished at his talent and comedic timing.


The breathtaking set is also worthy of note. The entire play takes place in the Oval Office, and the set is probably the most elegant I have ever seen. While the play takes shots at various political views (including mine), I still found the show to be extremely humorous, sharp, and witty.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Done

Today marked the conclusion of my Law School academic career. Everything is done. All that is left is the graduation. The journey has been wonderful, but more intense than I anticipated. Tax lawyers are a very intense bunch. Shockingly, while we are a minority at Law School, we take up a majority of the study space in the library.

The final push during the last six weeks has been incredible; typically each day has consisted of 17 to 21 hours of intense interpretation of code, deciphering regulations, and trying to memorize every last detail. My brain is now full.

So now, I’m going to spend some time away from the books, without any studying or memorizing. Oh, of course, that all ends once Bar preparation begins. That starts…oh…tomorrow.

Within fifteen minutes of finishing at Law School, I was headed to pick up my sixty pounds of Bar prep books.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Payless Pays More

Yesterday, a federal jury in Oregon awarded Adidas about $305 million, supposedly the largest trademark verdict ever.

This is a case that is near and dear to our hearts. Mine, simply because it is some interesting legal issues. Wife's because...well...let's just say she still recalls lot numbers of popular shoes that the chain sold a few years back. Wife has commented to me on numerous occasions that she doesn't understand how the company get away with selling fifteen dollar versions of very expensive shoes.

Predictably, Payless, owned by Kansas-based Collective Brands, called the verdict “excessive and unjustified” and said it plans to ask the court to set the verdict aside. If that request is not granted, the company “intends to take all necessary steps to overturn it. On the other hand, Adidas' lawyer predicts that while a reduction of the verdict is possible on appeal, he thinks Payless could wind up paying Adidas quite a bit more than $305 million. Upon a finding of willful infringement, the judge can not only award the plaintiffs attorneys fees (here, seven years worth) but can triple the damages portion of the verdict, which is $137 million.

Here is a copy of Addidas' brief. While I only skimmed it, the pictures are quite entertaining.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Getting Wild and Crazy in New York City

It's finals time. I'm living in the library for my very final round of this sheer torture. Spending up to 20 hours a day with my nose in outlines, statutes, and regs proves to be just as dreary as it sounds.

One woman discovered a way to make her studying slightly more palatable. Everyday she walks into the library with a tiny aquarium. The first few times I saw it, I couldn't figure out what it was - then I realized there was a fish swimming around in the water. She sets her contraption on the desk of her study space and then continues to work all day, occasionally glancing up at her little wet friend. Maybe I need to get a pet too.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Movie Shoot

Right outside of Law School there is some sort of movie shoot taking place today. It's definitely the largest one I have ever seen. There are probably 30 trucks and trailers, a hundred workers, countless cameras, and at least two food stations. I would love to explore and find out what is going on...but I'm busy.